![safari for mac os 10.4 11 safari for mac os 10.4 11](https://images.sftcdn.net/images/t_app-cover-l,f_auto/p/02d03792-96d5-11e6-9fff-00163ec9f5fa/3001614080/internet-explorer-for-mac-screenshot.png)
Most people, today, use Windows applications to write emails and edit documents. When you're writing an important email or editing a document, a browser crash is a big deal." That one is pretty humorous when you think about it. So what's wrong with today's browsers? What is it, exactly, that Google can suddenly offer that Mozilla and Microsoft can't, even after over a decade of experience, each, in this market? Here's what Google says is wrong with today's browsers, along with a helping serving of sarcasm: Stability Clearly, the existing browser makers-primarily Microsoft and Mozilla-are doing something that runs contrary to Google's bottom line.
![safari for mac os 10.4 11 safari for mac os 10.4 11](http://newgt936.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/3/125392632/726174844.png)
In this light, Google's initial rationale for creating a new browser "from scratch" seems more than a little self-serving. And Firefox 3 bears little technical relation to its Mosaic and Netscape predecessors. Today's IE looks like nothing like IE 1.0. If Microsoft can keep something as complex as Windows relevant almost 25 years after its inception, why can't something as simple as a Web browser application be similarly updated? Arguably, this is exactly what's happened, actually. Yet somehow Microsoft has been able to adapt Windows over the years, overhauling the underlying technology is major ways on several occasions. The Internet as we know it today certainly didn't exist when Microsoft first released Windows, after all. Sure.īut that, too, must be seen as a not-so-subtle dig at Microsoft. "These things didn't exist when the first Web browsers were created," the aforementioned comic book notes. Web-based applications, too, are increasing in complexity and sophistication. First, yes, Google is correct: Increasingly, users are turning to Web applications-no longer the "Web pages" of the past-for both work and play. Because we spend so much time online, we began seriously thinking about what kind of browser could exist if we started from scratch and built on the best elements out there." And in our spare time, we shop, bank, read news and keep in touch with friends - all using a browser. We search, chat, email and collaborate in a browser.
![safari for mac os 10.4 11 safari for mac os 10.4 11](https://news-cdn.softpedia.com/images/news2/Mac-OS-X-Tiger-Users-Also-Get-a-New-Safari-4-1-2.png)
Web applications, not Web pagesĪs Google notes, "All of us at Google spend much of our time working inside a browser. Tomorrow, on Tuesday, September 2nd, they will release a beta of the Windows version of the browser. The company issued a 38-page comic book describing the browser (seriously) and then provided a blog post describing their intentions. On Monday, September 1, 2008, the rumors became reality.
Safari for mac os 10.4 11 android#
WebKit itself isn't horrible, however, and it also provides back-end services for well-regarded technologies like Adobe AIR and Google's Android mobile platform. This time, however, the Google Browser would be built on top of WebKit, the open source Web browser engine that powers the lackluster Safari (a product so bad that Apple must distribute it like spyware). Then, earlier this year, the rumors switched gears, and the online giant reportedly constituted a "GBrower" team tasked with creating the Google Browser. The original rumors had Google partnering with Mozilla to create a Google-branded version of Firefox. A Google Web browser has been rumored for so long that it's now part of the fabric of the Web.